Comments on: TF2 Mapping: Soldier http://www.nodraw.net/2010/02/tf2-mapping-soldier/ Source Engine Level Design Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:31:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: grazr http://www.nodraw.net/2010/02/tf2-mapping-soldier/comment-page-1/#comment-1357 grazr Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:48:25 +0000 http://www.nodraw.net/?p=184#comment-1357 Nerdboy, The article isn't about rocket jumping, it's about balancing height advantages, and the ramifications of height differences in your level, in regards to the soldier. The height can be achieved in any variation by X class, but at the end of the day it needs to be considered critically, and here we see the consideration over the Soldier. It's not designing for rocket jumping, its designing for class balance. Nerdboy, The article isn’t about rocket jumping, it’s about balancing height advantages, and the ramifications of height differences in your level, in regards to the soldier.

The height can be achieved in any variation by X class, but at the end of the day it needs to be considered critically, and here we see the consideration over the Soldier.

It’s not designing for rocket jumping, its designing for class balance.

]]> By: Nerdboy http://www.nodraw.net/2010/02/tf2-mapping-soldier/comment-page-1/#comment-1355 Nerdboy Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:18:30 +0000 http://www.nodraw.net/?p=184#comment-1355 I hate to sound rude, but for an article on a class you described as the most utilizing of vertical space, there was very little mention of rocket jumping in design. Strictly speaking, there's more to rocket jumps than giving a soldier a ledge. I hate to sound rude, but for an article on a class you described as the most utilizing of vertical space, there was very little mention of rocket jumping in design. Strictly speaking, there’s more to rocket jumps than giving a soldier a ledge.

]]>